Local News RSS Feed


Essex firefighters lose £2m in dispute that never ends

A DISPUTE by Essex firefighters which has been running for nearly two years has saved the service more than £2million.

Members of the Fire Brigades Union are refusing to work overtime or to “act up” – filling in when more senior officers are off.

Fire chief David Johnson says the dispute is irrelevant as the changes which triggered it have have been successfully introduced.

He warns overtime and acting up payments could now be lost for good in view of the savings that have been made.

He said: “The dispute is still running, despite the fact the changes it is over have been in place since October 2, 2009.

“The action prevents our crews from earning extra income through overtime or by taking on temporary promotions.

“During the course of this industrial action, the service has saved £2.2million, with negligible impact on our frontline service.

“With such a significant saving to our running costs and the current challenging financial climate, we have to expect challenge from Essex Fire Authority on whether these practices should be reinstated once the action has come to an end.”

The dispute, about the level of cover required for aerial ladders and other specialist equipment, started in August 2009.

It was temporarily suspended a year ago when an agreement had been reached in principal.

But the industrial action was resumed last September when the union claimed management had added a clause to the agreement document. The union did not respond to requests for a comment.

Comments(6)

jut1972 says...
2:05pm Sun 10 Apr 11

Would seem to undermine any stories about lives being put at risk by this reorganization which is the trump card used in all these disputes.

It's impossible to argue against because it can't be quantified.

Heinz says...
9:35pm Sun 10 Apr 11

So, Essex firefighters effectively lost £2.2 million in pay.

I wonder how much their FBU organisers lost?

swalkie says...
7:24pm Mon 11 Apr 11

Gives them more time to do their second jobs!!

IMARLOW says...
10:40pm Tue 12 Apr 11

It's what the Fire Service are not saying that is the most telling, if they managed resources properly there would be no need for overtime.
Even after they have changed the crewing (in effect reducing the number of firefighters required for the total number of fire appliances) they still faced a shortage of manpower to the tune of over £2m.
“During the course of this industrial action, the service has saved £2.2million, with negligible impact on our frontline service".
So there has been and continues to be an impact then. Jump crewing isnt a matter if things go wrong it's a matter of when, then we can expect some sorry excuses from senior managers trying to justify this very risky policy.

simonsays22 says...
10:58am Fri 15 Apr 11

IMARLOW quick clarification: neg·li·gi·ble – adjective: so small, trifling, or unimportant that it may safely be neglected or disregarded: The extra expenses were negligible. (sourced at http://dictionary.re
ference.com/browse/n
egligible)

IMARLOW says...
1:26am Sun 17 Apr 11

Thanks for the clari-fi-cation i needed that.
Simple fact, enough resources in place as the tax payers pay for and no need for overtime and or acting up.

click2find

Most popular